Posts

Featured Post

Table of Contents

-
Mag Phenomenology Tayo Intro: Phenomenology of My Choice I. Rosario: Paulit-ulit na Dasal II. Inflation III. God Will Provide IV. Covid-19 V. Magbiro Nga Tayo sa Lasing VI. Ano Pa Nga Ang Pwedeng Trabaho ni Juan VII. Pagkakaisa VIII. Personal na Buha y IX. Bakit May Heartaches ? X. Bakit May Heartaches? Part II XI. Bakit May Heartaches? Part III XII. Bakit May...Part IV...Seriously XIII. Pagsasakripisyo XIV. At the Heart of the Controversy XV. What now? XVI. How to Do Thomistic Phenomenology? XVII. Safeguards XVIII. Lord, what do you want me to do? XIX. Absolute Moral Norms XX. Phenomenological Tools XXI. Proportionalism, Consequentialism, and Some History of My Choices XXII. Some Historical Insights XXIII. Phenomenology for Elementary Pupils XXIV. God is a Mystery XXV. Difficulty of Description XXVI. Jesus, I Trust in You XXVII. Having No Reason At All XXVIII. Deep Within Man There Dwells The Truth XXIX. Your Will Be Done XXX. True Happiness Not Just Pleasure XXXI. Lord, What Do You W...
Post a Comment
Read more

Prompting God?

-
 Spoiler alert, we call it praying. Well, a simple talking to God need not even a novice prompt engineering level. He knows the deepest content of our hearts before we even speak a word. Do you need to pray or do you need to use that LLM AI? Choose well since as we've said, treating AI as God will just disappoint. Talk to God if you need to. After that, use the LLM AI to let it help you. You need some sort of disambiguation or else AI will tell you, "I am not God."🤣 AI even clarified to me in our previous article that he is just operating in the natural level. AI knows its limit. But are you even aware that it cannot give you your need for God? Many youth may say praying is obsolete. Unless I think they experience what ages us all.🤣 I act as children do who cannot read; I say quite simply to the good God what I want to tell Him, and He always understands me. -St. Therese of Liseux I wouldn't tire quoting those since it's a short formula from a person called the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Phenomenology Should Not Make Us Naive

-
 It should rather make us wise as a serpent but gentle as a dove as Matthew 10:16 states. Are phenomenologists easier to be deceived? Not the second time around I think.🤣 The below discussion with Grok 3 pointed to latest epistemological validation of our phenomenological experiences as valid. It means we don't need to dismiss our subjective experiences as invalid and cannot be relied upon. By using the experience of being deceived, we and the larger communities are given the tools of awareness how invenstment scammers fools even the police detectives themselves, what to expect, how con artists manipulate everybody, and how we can invalidate the offer, which is explained time and again by journalists in news. Me: Husserl, the father of phenomenology, proposed a "Principle of all Principles": that every original, presentive intuition is a legitimate source of authority for knowledge, [Gemini said]. However I pushed ChatGPT to not go down the path of phenomenology correcti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Let AI Fail You

-
 People failed me. So I know they're not God. Let AI fail you, so that you know they are not God. Metaphysically God cannot err. In reality God cannot err, since he stops being God. God is a Perfect Being. But when we ask God for something, most often when our prayers are not heard, we always feel betrayed also. The logical proof though why something you prayed was not given isn't yet knowable. In heaven, we will understand all our whys here on earth perfectly like a full HD CCTV replays showing us the reason why our prayers was not heard. And we will praise God eternally for his goodness is perfect. For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall understand fully... 1 Cor. 13:12  But for now, we have to trust God. If you don't believe in God, you have to study human history and conclude that even Marx created something to replace that concept of a Supreme Being. Google AI, 14 March 2026 answered: Me: What did Karl Marx created to r...
Post a Comment
Read more

Discussing Bayesian Reasoning with a Bayesian Upgraded Gemini

-
Image
The following is a discussion with Gemini 3 Fast, 13 March 2026 Me: Why it seems we did not study Bayesian philosophy in my AB Philosophy course? Gemini: It is a common observation among Philosophy students that Bayesianism—and formal epistemology in general—often takes a backseat to more "traditional" or "historical" branches of the discipline. There are several structural and pedagogical reasons why your AB Philosophy curriculum likely prioritized other areas over Bayesian frameworks. 1. The Analytic vs. Continental Divide Most undergraduate Philosophy programs are built on a historical foundation that prioritizes the Western Canon (Socrates to Kant). Historical Focus: Programs often prioritize the "Great Works" to give students a cohesive narrative of how human thought evolved. The "Formal" Gap: Bayesianism sits at the intersection of Philosophy of Science and Mathematical Logic. Many general programs view it more as a specialized tool for sta...
Post a Comment
Read more