IX. Bakit May Heartaches?

-

Uunahan ko na kayo ha. Masakit ang heartache. 

Weh, di nga?🤣

Lintis naman, ang tanong ay bakit kasi meron.

Mas masakit pa iyan sa naputulan ng paa. 

Joke ba yan?🤣 Pakisagot na lang kasi yung tanong.

Sige, pero pakinggan nyo muna at pakisagot honestly ha. Yung kakilala ko kasi naputulan ng paa. Pagkatapos maputulan ay iniwan siya ng girlfriend nya.

(silence)

😭Oo na, agree na kami. Mas masakit ang iwan ka ng minamahal mo... Yun bang tanong ay sasagutin mo pa o...😠

Me heartache kasi may naghihiwalay...

Lintis namang sagot iyan.

Yung pagkakaputol ng paa, parte ng pagkatao mo ang nawala, ang kakayahan mong magtrabaho halimbawa, di lang yung physical feet. 

Ok, so parang mas masakit yun kesa sa heartache pala?😕

Pakinggan nyo muna ulit. Iniwan sya ng girlfriend nya kasi PBA player sya. 

Aaah...ok. Mas masakit nga ang heartache.😟 Di kaya nakadagdag lang yung heartache sa sakit ng pagkaputol ng paa? 

Tamo kayo, nasagot nyo na ng dalawang beses na mas masakit nga ang heartache ay, tapos magdududa pa kayo! Tapos mas gusto pa nyo ngayong pag-usapan ang sakit kesa sa sagot na paghihiwalay!

Dapat siguro di na lang nilikha ng Diyos ang heartache.

Akala ko ba ay gusto lang nyo ay sagot sa tanong kung bakit may heartache! Bakit parang affected kayo! Sabi ko na ay! Kaya inunahan ko na kayo ay. Walang ganyanan. Bahala kayo sa buhay nyo... Dyan na kayo... Mag emote kayo hanggat gusto nyo. (Kasi ako, ayaw kong me nakakakita sa akin na umiiyak.)😭 

(Me heartache kasi may hiwalayan. Pweh. Napakababaw na sagot. Pero napakasakit. Dapat kasi ang tanong ay bakit masakit ang heartache. Masakit ang heartache dahil may ache sa huli. Wahahaha🤣... Huhuhu😭. Buwiseeet.)

Ang tanong ko kasi ay bakit may heartache lang. Wag nyo na kasi sa akin itanong kung bakit masakit ang heartache... Waahh😭 Dyan na kayo!

Oi, wag ka umalis. Anu nangyari sa kanya?

« Previous Chapter | Table of Contents | Next Chapter »

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conclusion

-
Image
 I started phenomenologizing about my career choice but ended up praying. What happened? Recall me as a catholic who cannot bracket out my faith because it is a fundamental part of my being. It is also not helpful if we go on the other side of the linear equation, positing there is no God, and do phenomenologizing atheistically. We have lots of proof you can review why it isn't the road we took for such things as personal as my life career choice. We didn't focus on proving the existence of God though. There are lots of better proofs out there. We merely focused on doing phenomenology and my chosen topic, which is my career choices. If I phenomenologized during the boom of television, my career would also reflect on its effect. But I reflected today wherewith AI is affecting how I work. I used AI to simplify my complex ideas about my own career choices, which is like using a calculator to help me understand and situate those things that are bothering me about my career. Like ve...
Read more

Practical Thinking

-
 Would you believe that practical thinking is ethical thinking? "What path will I choose to achieve the end? Or what means will I use to achieve my goal?" "What should I do," is a practical question. But "What should I do with my life," is already half practical and half theoretical. It can include ethical philosophy already. Now extending it, the question "Lord, what should I do with my life?" becomes a prayer, a summon for help since we know by experience that the situation that is in front of us, is beyond our capacity to solve. We know by experience if something we need to solve is within our capacity by way of skill, knowledge, or accumulated experiences. We also know if its beyond our capacity to solve. We give thanks God that we have a banana to eat--we don't commonly ask God for help in eating the banana.🤣 I asked an AI and I actually learned a lot about my situation, why it's different from other's experiences, why it seems ...
Read more

Artificial Intelligence

-
Image
 You are also a model maker you may not yet realize though. The model out there for the taking is 20-20-20 rule for avoiding gadget glares and its consequences that for every 20 minute use of gadget with glares, you stop for 20 seconds and look 20 feet away. Then you observed it and acted on it. However, through trial and error you noticed that when you have migraine or is about to onset, 20 minutes is too long, and the 20 second time out is too short, and that 20 feet looking away is abrupt for you that you observed that you still look blank or blurred before you look and observe something 20 feet away. Perhaps you're still in your thought and can't observe things right away. You observe too that its better to stop, look away, and think about what you're reading for example without any timer which is more at pace with your thinking processes. The additional problem that you noticed though is that you tend to bypass the 20 minute focus when you don't have migraine and s...
Read more