The Pheno of Parousia

-

 If AI is the collective conscious of humanity and then if quantum AI computes it to its zenit then it will show intersubjectivity even to its highest form, albeit failing since every created being is finite. Phenomenologists have told us that intersubjectivity is a part of our consciousness. Jesus telling us the poor you will always have with you is a testament that finite reality was meant to make us dependent upon each other in a sense. Or as we've said anything absolutized is bad including independence. Even the Trinity is a revelation of a relational God. We are not an island actually has wrong assumptions. Even an island is dependent upon all intricate web of life both living and nonliving including other geographic formations nearby or far away.

What gives Christians a hope filled existense? This present imperfect existense is not our home. No matter how we perseverse to do what is good we will still fall short. So how come? God is the guarantor that whatever good we did on this life will be rewarded ultimately in heaven if not on earth. Of course it has its auxiliary guarantee and stirs terror in the heart of the unjust. What then is justice in the eyes of an Absolute Being? It starts with how we see justice here on earth. If our justice system is the only guarantee we have so that all parties involved will do his fair share of good, then we can rely on it. If there is none as history showed us time and again, anarchy ensues. The survival of the human family is established on a just and humane society. One prerequisite of justice is telling the truth or honoring one's word with others, honoring the name of God, property of others, parents, wife and family, life itself according to the 10 commandments. Without justice being honored by everybody, we will end up killing each other, nuke each other in the end. If no human being survive such, I don't think the apes will evolve again to become human beings or God will create another Adam and Eve or so. Since God has promised Noah he will not destroy earth with flood again, God seems to say he will not wipe out humanity again. If we rather do it by nuke, I think God will come back already and not start human creation again. But that's a theological opinion only. My point being that the responsibility lies at the hands of all human beings. Injustice breeds nuking each other. If you have other solutions to the problem of human being's interrelatedness, tell that to God who is the Omniscient One who has already revealed the Ten Commandments. I suppose we know quantum computers are not the omniscient one, neither any philosopher, since all of us are just created ones.

« Previous Chapter | Table of Contents | Next Chapter »


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conclusion

-
Image
 I started phenomenologizing about my career choice but ended up praying. What happened? Recall me as a catholic who cannot bracket out my faith because it is a fundamental part of my being. It is also not helpful if we go on the other side of the linear equation, positing there is no God, and do phenomenologizing atheistically. We have lots of proof you can review why it isn't the road we took for such things as personal as my life career choice. We didn't focus on proving the existence of God though. There are lots of better proofs out there. We merely focused on doing phenomenology and my chosen topic, which is my career choices. If I phenomenologized during the boom of television, my career would also reflect on its effect. But I reflected today wherewith AI is affecting how I work. I used AI to simplify my complex ideas about my own career choices, which is like using a calculator to help me understand and situate those things that are bothering me about my career. Like ve...
Read more

Practical Thinking

-
 Would you believe that practical thinking is ethical thinking? "What path will I choose to achieve the end? Or what means will I use to achieve my goal?" "What should I do," is a practical question. But "What should I do with my life," is already half practical and half theoretical. It can include ethical philosophy already. Now extending it, the question "Lord, what should I do with my life?" becomes a prayer, a summon for help since we know by experience that the situation that is in front of us, is beyond our capacity to solve. We know by experience if something we need to solve is within our capacity by way of skill, knowledge, or accumulated experiences. We also know if its beyond our capacity to solve. We give thanks God that we have a banana to eat--we don't commonly ask God for help in eating the banana.🤣 I asked an AI and I actually learned a lot about my situation, why it's different from other's experiences, why it seems ...
Read more

Artificial Intelligence

-
Image
 You are also a model maker you may not yet realize though. The model out there for the taking is 20-20-20 rule for avoiding gadget glares and its consequences that for every 20 minute use of gadget with glares, you stop for 20 seconds and look 20 feet away. Then you observed it and acted on it. However, through trial and error you noticed that when you have migraine or is about to onset, 20 minutes is too long, and the 20 second time out is too short, and that 20 feet looking away is abrupt for you that you observed that you still look blank or blurred before you look and observe something 20 feet away. Perhaps you're still in your thought and can't observe things right away. You observe too that its better to stop, look away, and think about what you're reading for example without any timer which is more at pace with your thinking processes. The additional problem that you noticed though is that you tend to bypass the 20 minute focus when you don't have migraine and s...
Read more