VII. Pagkakaisa

-

Iisa ang hangarin sa iisang patutunguhan. Mas madali nga natin itong mararating. Mas maraming gagawa, mas marami tayong matatapos. Pero ano ang direksiyon at saan patutungo? Ito ba ay nakabatay sa katotohanan, kaya nga makatarungan?

A basta! Walang kokontra, malayo ang mararating natin! Sama-sama tayo sa ating pagkawasak.🤣 Basta walang kokontra, ok na yun. Gets nyo ba? Kung walang malinaw na target e di natin yan mabu-bullseye. At kahit may criticism pa kung ito naman ay para matamaan natin ang tamang target, e di pakinggan. Pero may kumontra! Gets nyo? Wala yan sa pagkontra o hindi. Kailangang basehan natin ang katotohanan upang magkaroon ng tunay na pagkakaisa.

Di naman issue ang kawalan ng pagkakaisa, kasi nga may mga anomalya. At kailangan nating alamin ang buong katotohanan ng anomalya upang mawala ang pagkakawatak-watak. A, ganoon pala ang tamang proseso upang mawala ang pagkakanya-kanya. Paminsan nanlilinlang ang oso na nakabihis tupa upang magkaisa tayo sa maling akala at di magkaisa sa katotohanan. Ang sintomas ay pagkakawatak-watak, ang sakit ay corruption, ang gamot ay transparency in public governance. Ang sintomas mo ay ubo, ang dahilan o sakit ay acid reflux, kaya ka iinom ng Lagundi? Mas pwede siguro ang Kremil-S, di ba!

Parang mas gusto ko ang punto ng pagkakaiba-iba. Ang magiging punto ay pagtutulungan sa gitna ng pagkakaiba-iba. Sa pamilya na tayo, basic unit of society, may masarap magluto, meron ding mekaniko, merong tamad mag-aral pero sa pag-aalaga ng mga kapatid at pagsasaayos at paglilinis ng bahay magaling. Nagkakatulungan kaya mahirap pabagsakin ang ganyang pamilya.

Sana, magkakaiba man tayo sa buong Pilipinas, tahakin pa rin natin ang landas ng katotohanan. Dahil ang katotohanan ko kailanman ay di magiging panira o hadlang sa katotohanan mo. Kung ang 1+1 mo ay =2 ang 3×3 ko naman ay =9. Magkaiba tayo pero sumunod pareho sa katotohanan ng science of mathematics. Kung ganyan ay walang magkakagulo sa Pilipinas kahit magkakaiba tayo ng diskarte sa buhay.

« Previous Chapter | Table of Contents | Next Chapter »

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conclusion

-
Image
 I started phenomenologizing about my career choice but ended up praying. What happened? Recall me as a catholic who cannot bracket out my faith because it is a fundamental part of my being. It is also not helpful if we go on the other side of the linear equation, positing there is no God, and do phenomenologizing atheistically. We have lots of proof you can review why it isn't the road we took for such things as personal as my life career choice. We didn't focus on proving the existence of God though. There are lots of better proofs out there. We merely focused on doing phenomenology and my chosen topic, which is my career choices. If I phenomenologized during the boom of television, my career would also reflect on its effect. But I reflected today wherewith AI is affecting how I work. I used AI to simplify my complex ideas about my own career choices, which is like using a calculator to help me understand and situate those things that are bothering me about my career. Like ve...
Read more

Practical Thinking

-
 Would you believe that practical thinking is ethical thinking? "What path will I choose to achieve the end? Or what means will I use to achieve my goal?" "What should I do," is a practical question. But "What should I do with my life," is already half practical and half theoretical. It can include ethical philosophy already. Now extending it, the question "Lord, what should I do with my life?" becomes a prayer, a summon for help since we know by experience that the situation that is in front of us, is beyond our capacity to solve. We know by experience if something we need to solve is within our capacity by way of skill, knowledge, or accumulated experiences. We also know if its beyond our capacity to solve. We give thanks God that we have a banana to eat--we don't commonly ask God for help in eating the banana.🤣 I asked an AI and I actually learned a lot about my situation, why it's different from other's experiences, why it seems ...
Read more

Artificial Intelligence

-
Image
 You are also a model maker you may not yet realize though. The model out there for the taking is 20-20-20 rule for avoiding gadget glares and its consequences that for every 20 minute use of gadget with glares, you stop for 20 seconds and look 20 feet away. Then you observed it and acted on it. However, through trial and error you noticed that when you have migraine or is about to onset, 20 minutes is too long, and the 20 second time out is too short, and that 20 feet looking away is abrupt for you that you observed that you still look blank or blurred before you look and observe something 20 feet away. Perhaps you're still in your thought and can't observe things right away. You observe too that its better to stop, look away, and think about what you're reading for example without any timer which is more at pace with your thinking processes. The additional problem that you noticed though is that you tend to bypass the 20 minute focus when you don't have migraine and s...
Read more